Does my Pied-à-terre qualify for a 1031 Exchange???

The 1031 qualifications of vacation and second homes have long been a debated topic

by investors and their advisors. Lacking specific written guidance, it was not always clear

if such properties qualified as appropriate relinquished, or replacement, property for a


1031 tax exchange. Many taxpayers often exchanged vacation properties and second

homes under the premise that the property qualified for tax deferral because it was

purchased for investment purposes, either as an occasional rental or as an appreciation

play, and was not their primary residence. Such properties were deemed to have a dual use- to hold the property for both personal and investment purposes.

In recent years, the IRS and Tax Courts have further clarified the qualifications in tax court

rulings and, more importantly, the issuance of Revenue Procedure 2008-16. Taxpayers

and their advisors now have a much clearer picture of the desired qualifications to meet

the eligibility standards for a 1031 exchange.

In 2007 the Tax Court issued an adverse ruling disqualifying the exchange of a vacation

home in Moore v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2007-134). In its analysis, the court agreed

with the Service that the taxpayer’s primary intent of ownership for the properties was for

personal use, not investment, and thus denied the exchange.

Subsequently in 2007, the Inspector General of the Department of Treasury issued the

report “Like-Kind Exchanges Require Oversight to ensure Taxpayer Compliance” which

specifically addressed the lack of guidance with regards to vacation property and second

homes. In response, the IRS issued Revenue Procedure 2008-16 providing guidance for

assessing the suitability of a vacation property or second home for a tax deferred

exchange. Rev. Proc. 2008-16 defined the “qualifying use standards” of a relinquished/

replacement property dwelling unit, providing a safe harbor under which the IRS will not

challenge whether a dwelling unit qualifies as property held for productive use in a trade

or business or for investment under Section 1031.

Rev. Proc. 2008-16 defines the qualifying use standards for the sale of a vacation property

or second home dwelling unit as:

1. The dwelling in question must have been owned by the taxpayer for at least twenty four

months immediately before the exchange (defined as the “qualifying use period”),

2. During each of those two years the taxpayer must rent the dwelling at a fair market

amount for at least fourteen days, and

3. The taxpayer’s personal use of the property each year must not exceed more than

fourteen days or 10% of the days that the property was rented.

The qualifying use standards for replacement property are the same as those for

relinquished property for vacation property and second homes. Additionally, the Revenue

Procedure suggests that if a taxpayer purchasing a replacement property expecting the

property will meet the qualifications, but in actually does not, “if necessary, should file an

amended return and not report the transaction as an exchange.”

Rev. Procedure 2008-16 is just a safe harbor. An exchange may still fall outside the

parameters and meet the statutory requirements, but you should expect heightened

scrutiny in such a case. The safe harbor is effective for exchanges occurring on or after

March 10, 2008.

#Piedàterre #selling #buying #condo #nyc #realestate

Featured Posts
Recent Posts
Search By Tags
Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square

Contact Us

20 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, NY 10020 Tel: 212-641-3732

  • YouTube Social  Icon
  • Facebook Social Icon
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn Social Icon
  • iTunes Social Icon

© 2018 by Jacob Warfield